David Hirzel in Antarctica Dec 2022

Who’s in Charge? The Fundamentals of Leadership

The concept of “leadership” has a lot of currency these days, addressed in academic disciplines and institutes, and in countless corporate trainings and seminars.  Regardless of the enterprise, there has to be some place in any management hierarchy that is indisputably the pinnacle, occupied by a person who is unquestionably recognized, “the Boss.”

But that role is not necessarily one that any person can be molded to fill.  Yes, there are techniques and characteristics that can be identified and reinforced, but there has to be something more, something that is inherent in a person, rather than a position.

In the canon of Antarctic exploration, there are those who envisioned, created, and completed the vast enterprises of these expeditions—Scott, Shackleton, Mawson, Amundsen, and others less well-known—who are taken for their leaders.  Their names have achieved a justly warranted fame that outshines that of many of their subordinates, whose own signal accomplishments go mostly unheralded.

Who led the smaller, isolated field parties adrift in the vast Antarctic snowfields, many hundreds of miles from the relative security of the base huts?   Lt. Michael Barne was (like almost everyone else in the Discovery Expedition’s 1901-1904 complement) a total novice at exploring, but he led his handful of men out into the Barrier hinterlands twice, and brought them safely home with new discoveries.  When Scott’s northern party were left to their own devices over the austral winter of 1912, it was Victor Campbell who provided a strong center around which his small field party coalesced and survived.  It was Frank Wild who kept the marooned survivors of Endurance’s shipwreck alive in 1916 with a glimmer of hope that Shackleton would return to save them.  On the other side of the continent, Ernest Joyce stepped into a role beyond his training when Aeneas Mackintosh was no longer strong enough to lead.

The exploration of Antarctica during the Heroic Era, and in every era afterwards, provides many more examples of those whose leadership was more a result of who they were, than of what they had learned.

One Response

  1. There is a modern concept of the player-coach. While this phrase is usually used with sports teams, it can also be used in corporate leadership. Bill McDermott, CEO of SAP, wrote an excellent management book in 2014 called “Winners Dream: A Journey from Corner Store to Corner Office” in which he attributes part of his success to seeing himself as a player-coach.

    The early Antarctic explorers Scott, Shackleton, Amundsen and Mawson, were also all player-coaches. There is a lot we can learn from the early Antarctic explorers about the importance of being a player-coach.

Share POST :

Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Email

Further Reading: